The City of Compton filed a damages claim against Los Angeles County recently, alleging the sheriff’s department has bilked the city out of millions of dollars by falsely reporting the amount of time deputies spend patrolling the city.
“We believe that a theft of historic proportions has taken place, resulting in damages which potentially amount to millions in taxpayer dollars, pilfered and stolen from the residents of the city of Compton,” City Attorney Damon Brown said at a news conference announcing the claim. “This fraud and theft has left the residents vulnerable and has led to spikes in unsolved crime.”
The claim accuses the sheriff’s department of committing “minutes fraud.”
“The allegation is that the county is paid 20-plus millions of dollars to patrol these streets, to make sure the streets are safe, to make sure the residents are safe,” said attorney Jamon Hicks, who is representing the city. “When in actuality, what is happening is fraudulent billing. What that means is that we have deputies that are saying they’re at locations that they’re not at. And we have deputies that are saying they’re patrolling the streets … when they are not. Or that they’re doing what’s called excessive billing, including overtime fraud. All of that is to the detriment of the city.”
Sheriff Alex Villanueva said the department is conducting a thorough audit but believes it would be a stretch to cry ‘fraud.’
“We have about 45 contracts and we measure the minutes, and there’s a rate — we have to get close to 100 percent, either slightly above or slightly below,” Villanueva said. “If we’re missing that target, I don’t think it’s going to be the grand conspiracy that the outgoing mayor of Compton wants it to be.”
Compton Mayor Aja Brown said the allegations were “confirmed by a whistleblower, a deputy sheriff at the Compton Station.”
“The result is a major under-staffing at Compton Station, lack of responsiveness to calls for service and increased crime and danger to our community,” Brown said.
Hicks said multiple sheriff’s deputies have corroborated the whistleblower claims. He said the city will be asking the District Attorney’s office to review whether the case rises to the level of possible criminal activity.
The city attorney said the city’s five-year contract with the sheriff’s department began in 2019, beginning at $22 million a year, with annual increases during the life of the contract.
Villanueva noted that at the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, when the court system was closed down, “we flooded all of the patrol stations with extra personnel.”
“We went way beyond the 100 percent compliance with all of the contracts,” he said. “Didn’t get a single complaint from a single one that we were not complying with the contract, strangely.”
The city’s claim seeks unspecified damages. Filing a claim is a required prerequisite to pursuing legal action against a government agency. If the county rejects the claim or fails to respond, the city can file a lawsuit.