Who is watching the supercommittee?

Email Print Twitter Facebook MySpace Stumble Digg More Destinations
Julianne Malveaux  |   OW Contributing Columnist

$1.5 trillion in cuts by Nov. 23

When President Barack Obama signed the Budget Control Act of 2011, he committed our nation to a budget-cutting process that may well be cumbersome.

The “Supercommittee,” or the Joint Select Committee on Budget Reduction, has a hard timeline of proposing some $1.5 trillion in cuts by Nov. 23. If Congress does not pass the Supercommittee proposals, then an automatic trigger will cut the budget across the board by about 9 percent.

I suppose the thinking behind creating the Supercommittee, composed of six Democrats and six Republicans, is that 12 minds are better than 535. The size of the committee may also make it easier for lobbyists. According to Politico, more than 200 lobbyists are pressuring Supercommittee members to protect their interests.

Who will protect the interests of young people, especially those who attend HBCUs? Already, students have been hard hit by budget machinations.

Beginning July 1, 2012, students will no longer receive an interest subsidy on their undergraduate and graduate student loans. Before now, while studying, student loans were interest-free, with interest kicking in only when they began repayment. No more. That will save about $18 billion in the next decade, but at what cost? It is ironic that on one hand, President Obama wants our nation to again lead the world in the percentage of people who are college graduates, and at the same time, yet another hurdle is being imposed on those who want to go to college.

For now, it appears that the Pell Grant of $5,500 for low-income students remains intact.

However, the Supercommittee is looking for places to cut, and they are looking everywhere.

Absent lobbyists, we will all have to lobby to protect the students who do not have the resources of the healthcare industry, legal associations, and those other 200 crowding Capitol Hill.

To be sure, many of the Supercommittee members are committed to education. Congressman James Clyburn (D-S.C.), for example, is the only Congressional Black Caucus member on the Supercommittee. He has long been a friend of Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs). He is likely to find allies among other Democrats on the Supercommittee. However, will they be able to withstand both the Republican zeal to reduce the size of government or the automatic triggers that will take place, if the Supercommittee can’t find compromise?

It is also likely that Title III funding, which is specifically targeted to HBCUs, will be on the chopping block. Earlier this month, several United Negro College Fund presidents met with members of the Congressional Black Caucus to talk about ways that Title III money can be protected. Those who care about HBCUs must lobby not only CBC members and congressional representatives in areas where HBCUs are located, but also any and every voter, especially those on the Supercommittee. The committee is co-chaired by Senator Patty Murray (D-Wash.) and Congressman Jeb Hensarling (R-Texas), and includes senators Max Baucus (D-Mont.), John Kerry (D-Mass.), John Kyle (R-Ariz.), Rob Portman (R-Ohio), and Pat Toomey (R-Pa.).

Congressional representatives include Xavier Becerra (D-Calif.), Clyburn (D-S.C.), Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.), Fred Upton (R-Mich.) and David Camp (R-Mich.).

When you scour the headlines, you won’t find much written about the Supercommittee, even though they are in the throes of meetings and negotiations. We can expect Democrats to protect entitlements and Republicans to resist tax increases, and these are sure ingredients for an impasse. When the Supercommittee was formed, critics from both the left and the right talked about the possibility of it deadlocking, because in order to attain a simple majority, somebody will have to cross party lines. The last time we faced a budget impasse, we ended up with a reduction in our Standard and Poor’s rating from AAA to AA+. When it cut our nation’s rating, S&P said their prognosis for the long-term fiscal health of the United States was “poor.”

The Supercommittee may well be out of the news, but it should not be off our radar screen. The dozen members are making decisions that will have long-term consequences. They may well decide to tackle aspects of our tax structure, and they will certainly decide to cut some, if not all, federal programs. We must all ensure that the Supercommittee will not reduce the deficit on the backs of the poor and the powerless, especially our students.

Julianne Malveaux is president of Bennett College for Women in Greensboro, N.C.


DISCLAIMER: The beliefs and viewpoints expressed in opinion pieces, letters to the editor, by columnists and/or contributing writers are not necessarily those of OurWeekly.

Related Articles

  • Examining the flawed immigration reform bill -

    The Senate’s Gang of Eight have put together an 844-page monstrosity known as the Border Security, Economic Opportunity and Immigration Modernization Act, legislation that President Barack Obama says he “basically approves” of.

    The crafters of this essentially unreadable bill were senators Dick Durbin (Illinois), Robert Menendez (D-N.J.), Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.), Michael Bennett (D-Colo.), Marco Rubio (R-Fla.), Jeff Flake (Ariz.), John McCain (R-Ariz.) and Lindsay Graham (R-S.C.).

  • Robert Champion: Drum Major for Change -

    Most parents of college students look forward to December, when their students come home for the holidays. Some are so excited to see their offspring home that they actually come to their colleges to pick them up. Others prepare special treats and goodies as an antidote to the oft-complained-about cafeteria food.

    Robert and Pam Champion won’t have that opportunity. Their son, Robert, died on Nov. 19. His death has been ruled a homicide, and he is allegedly the victim of hazing.

  • Much ado about nuttin’ -

    In the wake of President Obama’s address to the Congressional Black Caucus, there are those who are making much ado about nothing, including the accusation that, by dropping his “g’s” the President was talking down to African Americans. Can this President kindly get a break.

  • At Last -

    When Beyoncé Knowles sang the Etta James song “At Last” at President Barack Obama’s 2009 inauguration, the song could have had several meanings. At last, we have an African American president? At last, the muscle of the Black vote has been flexed? At last, there is some hope for our country to come together with the mantra “Yes We Can.”

  • Achievement gap or opportunity gap? -

    African American students achieve at a different level than White students. Test scores are lower, as are high school and college completion rates, and the number of African Americans attending four-year institutions is falling. The rate of African American suspensions and expulsions from K-12 schools is higher than that of other groups. By almost any metric, there are gaps between African American students and White or Asian students (Latinos achieve at about the same rate as African Americans).

  • Across Black America

    Here’s a look at African American people and issues making headlines throughout the country.
     

    Alabama
    Freeman A. Hrabowski, president of the University of Maryland, Baltimore County, will address the annual African American Business Council luncheon on June 28. Hrabowski, who is chairman of President Barack Obama’s Advisory Commission on Education Excellence for African Americans, has a national reputation for his work studying the performance of minority students in math and science. Hrabowski, named one of the 10 best college presidents in the country by Time magazine, was a child leader in the Civil Rights Movement in Birmingham in the 1960s.
     

    Arkansas
    The Liberty Counsel filed a motion and a brief in United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas seeking to intervene on behalf of a Concepts of Life crisis pregnancy center to defend against a suit filed by the American Civil Liberties Union and the Center for Reproductive Rights. The groups seek to impose a permanent injunction before the Human Heartbeat Protection Act goes into effect July 18. Liberty Counsel also filed a brief opposing the ACLU’s request for an injunction. The “Heartbeat” bill states that when a woman seeks an abortion at or after the 12th week, doctors must test for a fetal heartbeat before an abortion is performed and inform the pregnant mother that the child in her womb has a heartbeat. If a heartbeat is detected, a woman cannot have an abortion, except in cases of rape, incest, and if a mother’s life is in danger. “As we promised when the legislation was introduced, Liberty Counsel will defend this law without reservation for the people of Arkansas, born and pre-born,” said Matt Staver, founder and chairman of Liberty Counsel. “No right is more foundational than the right to life. Without life, all other rights are irrelevant,” concluded Staver.