Healthcare and the Supreme Court

Email Print Twitter Facebook MySpace Stumble Digg More Destinations
David M. Carlisle  |   OW Guest Contributor

Through the Stethoscope

Any day now the United States Supreme Court will decide the fate of the Affordable Care Act (ACA), the most sweeping healthcare overhaul since the arrival of federal Medicare and Medicaid in 1965. And while the stakes are high both for our country and our state, the outcome of the Supreme Court’s decision will likely be most noticeable to communities like the one I work in every day—South Los Angeles.

The promise of affordable and quality healthcare is critical to a community where nearly 34 percent of residents are uninsured—one of the highest rates in the state.

Why? Because as it stands, our neighborhoods in South Los Angeles have L.A. County’s highest rates of disease and premature deaths from preventable conditions like diabetes, lung cancer and heart disease.

With the Affordable Care Act in place, nine out of 10 Californians will have access to insurance in 2019, and it is very likely that those rates of premature and preventable illness will decline.

Without the law, it is likely that those preventable conditions will persist, that people will continue to flood emergency rooms for basic care, and that costs will continue to escalate for many of the city’s poorest residents.

Even with the law, there are two pressing issues facing the people I work with on a daily basis: coverage for undocumented residents and the primary care physician shortage. Only if we address these two issues do we ensure healthcare access for all.

Undocumented residents in South Los Angeles are not eligible for health insurance under the act.

They are not offered Medicaid and denied low-income subsidies to purchase entry into state health exchanges. As a result, they will continue to seek care in safety-net healthcare systems for the uninsured within Los Angeles County hospitals. Without coverage, these individuals, who constitute a growing percentage of our population and who are part of the fabric of our community, greatly impact our healthcare system.

In any of the post-ACA decision scenarios, we need to have comprehensive and honest conversations to provide community-based, culturally competent solutions.

And after we fight to expand coverage for all, we are left with a profound primary-care doctor shortage. The Association of American Medical Colleges estimates a shortage of approximately 21,000 primary-care physicians in 2015, and South Los Angeles already has one of the highest shortages of healthcare professionals. An increase in the number of insured and the growing elderly population places a burden on the medical work force.

An essential solution to the shortage is to expand medical education in underserved communities. After all, key determinants of where physicians practice include where they are from and where they obtain their medical training.

We need to incentivize students with expanded scholarship and loan repayment programs for those who choose to serve in primary care.

Other solutions include the creation of new practice models, such as patient-centered medical homes, technology improvements, adding additional primary-care residency training slots, as well as a greater reliance on nurse practitioners and physician assistants who provide significant access to primary healthcare services, particularly in underserved communities.

No matter the Court’s decision, South Los Angelenos, and all underserved communities, should have access to quality care by a work force that is trained and employed to help all of our residents. I urge California and Los Angeles to push ahead to implement elements of the Affordable Care Act to bring coverage to millions more people and curb skyrocketing health costs.

The problems faced by the underserved don’t go away, so let’s not ignore them, let’s do something about it.

DISCLAIMER: The beliefs and viewpoints expressed in opinion pieces, letters to the editor, by columnists and/or contributing writers are not necessarily those of OurWeekly.

Related Articles

  • Villaraigosa, Bass, Boxer, others applaud Supreme Court for upholding Affordable Care Act -

    Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa issued the following statement Thursday in response to the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision to uphold the basic provision of the Affordable Care Act:

    “Today’s ruling by the Supreme Court to uphold the basic provisions of the Affordable Care Act is a historic step forward for our country. Healthcare for each and every individual is not a privilege; it’s a right. This morning’s decision is a victory for all Americans, and I could not be prouder.

  • Door to good healthcare could swing open or shut for millions -

    The U. S. Supreme Court this week is expected to decide whether to repeal, uphold or alter President Barack Obama’s healthcare reform law, placing Black leaders of Congress on edge and preparing for a re-election battle whichever way the ruling comes down.

  • What healthcare reform means for Americans -

    As many people know, last year President Barack Obama signed into law the Affordable Healthcare Act promising millions of Americans better health coverage. From its creation there has been much debate about the law, and many are still unclear of how it affects them individually. Additionally, some Americans are unaware of the changes that have already been implemented.

  • Gov. Brown wants to expand Medi-Cal -

    LOS ANGELES, Calif. — County officials today raised concerns about Gov. Jerry Brown’s plans to use anticipated savings under health care reform to pay for other programs for the poor.

  • Obamacare: ushering in an age of socialized medicine -

    “Oh what a tangled web we weave ….”

    The Affordable Care Act, aka Obamacare, is starting to rear its ugly head. Many of us think the concept is dangerous and costly. What is evolving is that it is the worst thing to ever happen to the U.S. economy. Right now this is clear: the federal government has taken over our healthcare industry. It has taken it over without any expertise or clear strategy. Almost daily new horrors are popping up. My brothers and sisters we are about to emulate Sweden and Canada. Socialized medicine is coming to America.

  • Across Black America

    Here’s a look at African American people and issues making headlines throughout the country.
     

    Alabama
    Freeman A. Hrabowski, president of the University of Maryland, Baltimore County, will address the annual African American Business Council luncheon on June 28. Hrabowski, who is chairman of President Barack Obama’s Advisory Commission on Education Excellence for African Americans, has a national reputation for his work studying the performance of minority students in math and science. Hrabowski, named one of the 10 best college presidents in the country by Time magazine, was a child leader in the Civil Rights Movement in Birmingham in the 1960s.
     

    Arkansas
    The Liberty Counsel filed a motion and a brief in United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas seeking to intervene on behalf of a Concepts of Life crisis pregnancy center to defend against a suit filed by the American Civil Liberties Union and the Center for Reproductive Rights. The groups seek to impose a permanent injunction before the Human Heartbeat Protection Act goes into effect July 18. Liberty Counsel also filed a brief opposing the ACLU’s request for an injunction. The “Heartbeat” bill states that when a woman seeks an abortion at or after the 12th week, doctors must test for a fetal heartbeat before an abortion is performed and inform the pregnant mother that the child in her womb has a heartbeat. If a heartbeat is detected, a woman cannot have an abortion, except in cases of rape, incest, and if a mother’s life is in danger. “As we promised when the legislation was introduced, Liberty Counsel will defend this law without reservation for the people of Arkansas, born and pre-born,” said Matt Staver, founder and chairman of Liberty Counsel. “No right is more foundational than the right to life. Without life, all other rights are irrelevant,” concluded Staver.