Crenshaw rail line: Let’s avoid being taken for a ride
Between the Lines
The Metropolitan Transit Authority (MTA) is set to take a key vote this week on the long-awaited Crenshaw-LAX rail transit line. A motion proposed by Supervisor Mark Ridley-Thomas seeks to address serious deficiencies on the Crenshaw leg of the line, deficiencies that involve economic viability and public-safety concerns in our community.
A stop in Leimert Park Village could address the economic viability concern.
A subway tunnel from 48th Street to 60th Street would address both the issue of economic viability and public safety. One thing is clear, it is imperative that the community position be heard and supported. Failure to do so could cause commercial investment and economic development to move past our community as quickly as the train line they intend to build. We can’t let that happen, so we must let our voices be heard this week.
Here’s what’s at stake: the current rail design that is set to begin as early as 2014 (a decade and a half earlier than the original start date of 2029) and was originally a proposed bus line, was set to stop at Crenshaw and King, then again at Crenshaw and Hyde Park, rolling past a prime, cultural and economic center in our community—Leimert Park Village.
Now, if you look at community cultural centers all over the city, public rail transit stops there. People would have to walk four or five blocks to get to Leimert Park, when a redesign would let them off one half block from the village. The community wants the Leimert Park stop, and they should have it.
The MTA staff recommendations do not take into consideration the community sentiment and merits of their position (they rarely do, but that’s going to change). Numbers crunchers and bean counters can determine the infrastructure development of the Black community for the next 80 years to come. It isn’t until we go down to MTA in mass organization and help them understand the community’s position.
More critically is the issue of public safety, traffic congestion and economic suppression of businesses that will occur with a rail line running up the middle of Crenshaw before it peels off on Florence Boulevard. The current design is proposing the train runs at grade (street level), the Ridley-Thomas motion is proposing a subway tunnel under Crenshaw from 48th to 60th streets, near the Hyde Park stop, so that the following things don’t occur:
• the inability to cross Crenshaw because of the rail track barriers that prohibit left turns and discourage pedestrians from crossing;
• the increase in gridlock that already paralyzes Crenshaw would be increased;
• businesses along the Crenshaw/Hyde Park corridor would see a decrease in business because of the difficulties in reaching businesses along rail line corridors;
lastly, the meridian currently dividing Crenshaw and decorated with palm trees and greenery would be uprooted for rail construction.
You know our community was the last to get landscaping in the city. Now, they want to take it out.
All the reason to listen to the community’s request to go below grade or above grade (build a bridge like at LaCienega Boulevard and Rodeo Road). A subway design wouldn’t cost any more than the proposed at grade if the redesign was incorporated before construction started. So there is time to do it.
Again, the community’s voice must be heard. How we position ourselves on this mass transit infrastructure issue will speak volumes on how we impact the economic growth and prosperity of Leimert Park Village and the Hyde Park Business District. What we cannot allow is the underdevelopment of mass transit that tends to ghettoize urban communities.
Urban centers are designed around two things: schools and mass transit. Business comes where the transit stops, and homeowners come where the schools are. The money then follows both.
Until our community understands that mis-designing mass transit is a detriment to the economic development prospects of our community, we will never see the change we desire.
When we get it, they get it. We just have to show MTA the Crenshaw community now gets it and make they get it, too. We know what we want in our communities. With the community watchdogs and policy sophistication we have now, they’ll never mis-design another rail system … and that’s a good thing.
Show up at 9 a.m. on Thursday, MTA Board Room, 1 Gateway Plaza, Los Angeles. Wear black shirts in unity and demand the support of a Leimert Park stop and a subway corridor on Crenshaw.
Anthony Asadullah Samad, Ph.D., is a national columnist, managing director of the Urban Issues Forum (www.urbanissuesforum.com) and author of the upcoming book, “Real Eyez: Race, Reality and Politics in 21st Century Popular Culture.” He can be reached at www.AnthonySamad.com or on Twitter.com at @dranthonysamad.com.
DISCLAIMER: The beliefs and viewpoints expressed in opinion pieces, letters to the editor, by columnists and/or contributing writers are not necessarily those of OurWeekly.
The Los Angeles Metropolitan Transit Authority did its usual “rope-a-dope” with the Black community last week on the most important infrastructure investment of the next 100 years.
After the August employment report came and it showed the economy flatlining (at least for a month) on new jobs, President Obama’s jobs plan is coming right on time. Lazy ass Congress is back at work, after a summer of political gamesmanship, and we will now see if all the “big talk” will turn to action. Or will it be more of the ideological bickering that led to gridlock the past year, and the whining of Democrats that the president is not fighting hard enough.
In this time of government contraction, municipal services reduction and fiscal scrutiny, Los Angeles County, the nation’s largest county, is undergoing a massive revision of its General Plan.
The General Plan represents hundreds of billions in resource allocation based on regional and local population growth forecasts that will take place over the next three decades.
Watching a President of the United States give a State of the Union address is often like watching a peacock strut, its head jutting forward with each step, and its splayed feathers shouting, “Look at me. I’m tall. I’m beautiful. I have it all. I did it all.”
The president usually lists an embellished log of accomplishments and forecasts a list of unreasonable—if not unachievable—expectations. Then Congress comes back and peacocks what it has done. The president and Congress, like the peacocks, claim they can do everything but fly.
This week is our annual King dance.
I call it the King dance because it’s the time of year when American society dances around the significance of Martin Luther King Jr. and his contributions to the evolution of American society.
It is really difficult to grapple with the compromising of the King legacy.
King was more than a day off work. King marched for social justice and economic equality. He didn’t march in parades. I never got the parade concept. What are we celebrating? The life of Martin Luther King Jr., you say.
